{"id":3143,"date":"2017-10-01T19:30:53","date_gmt":"2017-10-01T23:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/?p=3143"},"modified":"2021-11-23T17:17:00","modified_gmt":"2021-11-23T22:17:00","slug":"quantitative-easing-housing-legacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/2017\/10\/01\/quantitative-easing-housing-legacy\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantitative easing housing legacy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignright is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.raymondjames.com\/-\/media\/rj\/dotcom\/images\/wealth-management\/market-commentary-and-insights\/economic-commentary\/170925\/170925-1.png?resize=188%2C128&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"quantitative easing\" width=\"188\" height=\"128\"\/><figcaption>Fed Balance Sheet (infographic from raymondjames.com)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The Fed stopped purchasing mortgage backed securities and other assets through quantitative easing a few years ago.&nbsp; But the&nbsp; Fed still maintains the estimated <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/blog\/ben-bernanke\/2017\/01\/26\/shrinking-the-feds-balance-sheet\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">$4.5 trillion of assets<\/a> it has accumulated by extending asset maturity and reinvesting in the securities.&nbsp; The result has been historically low interest rates, and bubble-esque home price spikes.&nbsp; But that may change rapidly over the next six months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quantitative easing was a name for the Fed\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalreserve.gov\/faqs\/what-were-the-federal-reserves-large-scale-asset-purchases.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201clarge scale asset purchases<\/a>\u201d (LSAP) from mid-2008 to 2014.&nbsp; The purpose of the LSAP was to keep boost the economy and housing markets by keeping interest rates low.&nbsp; According to the Fed (federalreserve.gov):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">In December 2008, as evidence of a dramatic slowdown in the U.S. economy mounted, the Federal Reserve reduced its target for the federal funds rate&#8211;the interest rate that depository institutions charge each other for borrowing funds overnight&#8211;to nearly zero, in order to provide stimulus to household and business spending and so support economic recovery. With short-term interest rates at nearly zero, the Federal Reserve made a series of large-scale asset purchases (LSAPs) between late 2008 and October 2014.<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">In conducting LSAPs, the Fed purchased longer-term securities issued by the U.S. government and longer-term securities issued or guaranteed by government-sponsored agencies such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The Fed purchased the securities in the private market through a competitive process; the Fed does not purchase government securities directly from the U.S. Treasury. The Fed&#8217;s purchases reduced the available supply of securities in the market, leading to an increase in the prices of those securities and a reduction in their yields. Lower yields on mortgage-backed securities reduced mortgage rates as well. Moreover, private investors responded to lower yields on U.S. Treasury securities and agency-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities by seeking to acquire assets with higher yields&#8211;assets such as corporate bonds and other privately issued securities. Investors&#8217; purchases raised the prices of those securities and reduced their yields. Thus, the overall effect of the Fed&#8217;s LSAPs was to put downward pressure on yields of a wide range of longer-term securities, support mortgage markets, and promote a stronger economic recovery.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>In the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalreserve.gov\/newsevents\/pressreleases\/monetary20170614a.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">June Open Market Committee press release<\/a>, the Fed signaled that it would begin unwinding quantitative easing later in 2017 through \u201cbalance sheet normalization.\u201d&nbsp; Of course, the proviso was that the economy would \u201cevolve broadly.\u201d&nbsp; The normalizing the balance sheet would \u201c<em>gradually reduce the Federal Reserve&#8217;s securities holdings by decreasing reinvestment of principal payments from those securities<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is little doubt that the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bea.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\">3.1 percent real Second Quarter 2017 GDP<\/a> (bea.gov), along with a record breaking housing market during the first half of 2017 was a large part in the decision to move forward with the balance sheet normalization program.\u00a0 At the very end of <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.federalreserve.gov\/newsevents\/pressreleases\/monetary20170920a.htm\" target=\"_blank\">September&#8217;s Open Market Committee press release<\/a>, the Fed stated that balance sheet normalization will begin in October.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>How will unwinding quantitative easing affect the housing market?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Since the Fed\u2019s announcement last week to unwind quantitative easing, there has been a lot of speculation as to how the housing market will respond.\u00a0 Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association of Realtors, issued a statement saying that he believes the Fed\u2019s unwinding pace will be \u201cin slow motion\u201d and \u201cmortgage rates would rise up only modestly over time.\u201d\u00a0 He expects that the 30-year fixed rate would only reach about 4.7 percent by the end of 2018 (nar.realtor).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But a sober 2013 article written by Edward Pinto, a former Fannie Mae executive, pointed out the immediate impact and consequences of quantitative easing (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/SB10001424127887323646604578400252745095518\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>Is the Fed blowing a new housing bubble?<\/em><\/a> wsj.com, April 9, 2013).&nbsp; Pinto asserted that the home price surge of 2013 was due to the Fed\u2019s LSAP rather than the often cited \u201cbroad based improvements in the economy\u2019s fundamentals.\u201d&nbsp; Pinto stated, \u201c<em>The average mortgage rate during the first nine years of the 2000s was 6.3% compared with today\u2019s <\/em>[2013] <em>rate of less than 3.5%. If mortgage rates were to increase to a moderate 6% in three years, say, some combination of three things would have to happen to keep the same level of homeownership affordability. Incomes would need to increase by a third, house prices would need to decline by a quarter, or lending standards would need to be loosened even further<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Maybe the unwinding of quantitative easing is past due.&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/2017\/04\/28\/gonzo-home-sales-prices\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Home sale prices have since surged<\/a> past 2006 home prices in some areas, and has considerably <a href=\"http:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/2017\/07\/30\/find-affordable-home\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">reduced the affordability<\/a> of homeownership for many Americans.&nbsp; Average <a href=\"https:\/\/www.frbatlanta.org\/chcs\/wage-growth-tracker.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">wages <\/a>have not increased significantly (if at all) since quantitative easing began.&nbsp; Lending has loosened some, but not enough to make up for missing home buyer sectors (such as the <a href=\"http:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/2017\/09\/10\/move-up-home-buyers-still-absent\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">move-up home buyer<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Home sellers may be in for a shock in 2018.&nbsp; Rising interest rates will certainly moderate home prices.&nbsp; However, rising mortgage rates would likely mean a return to stable housing market.&nbsp; Mortgage interest rates will rise as sharply as they were reduced when the LSAP began, most likely rising above 5 percent by the end of 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By Dan Krell<br \/> Copyright\u00a9 2017<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Original published at https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/2017\/10\/01\/quantitative-easing-housing-legacy\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you like this post, do not copy; instead please:<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/wp.me\/p1VZLf-OH\">link to the article<\/a>,<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/facebook.com\/dankrellrealestate\/\">like it at facebook<\/a><br \/>or <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/dankrell\">re-tweet<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.copyscape.com\/plagiarism-detector\/\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" height=\"16\" width=\"234\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/banners.copyscape.com\/images\/cs-bk-3d-234x16.gif?resize=234%2C16\" alt=\"Protected by Copyscape Web Plagiarism Detector\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/disclaimer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Disclaimer<\/a>. This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Readers should not rely solely on the information contained herein, as it does not purport to be comprehensive or render specific advice. Readers should consult with an attorney regarding local real estate laws and customs as they vary by state and jurisdiction. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Fed stopped purchasing mortgage backed securities and other assets through quantitative easing a few years ago.&nbsp; But the&nbsp; Fed still maintains the estimated $4.5 trillion of assets it has accumulated by extending asset maturity and reinvesting in the securities.&nbsp; The result has been historically low interest rates, and bubble-esque home price spikes.&nbsp; But that &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/2017\/10\/01\/quantitative-easing-housing-legacy\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Quantitative easing housing legacy&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[567,234,86,270,469,382,405,288,651,17,13,26,138],"tags":[891,966,893,839,490,936,912,466,987,500,1106,797,593,869],"class_list":["post-3143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-economy","category-federal-reserve","category-home-buyer","category-home-prices","category-home-seller","category-homebuyer","category-housing-market","category-housing-recovery","category-mortgage-interest-rates","category-real-estate","category-real-estate-market","category-real-estate-recovery","tag-ben-bernanke","tag-economics","tag-economy","tag-federal-reserve","tag-home-buyer-2","tag-home-prices","tag-home-seller","tag-housing-market-2","tag-housing-recovery","tag-interest-rate","tag-quantitative-easing","tag-real-estate","tag-real-estate-market-2","tag-real-estate-recovery"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1VZLf-OH","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3143"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3143\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6258,"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3143\/revisions\/6258"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dankrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}