Hire a real estate agent

Why should you hire a real estate agent? Home buying and selling without an agent is not for everyone.

A somewhat prophetic Howard Schneider proclaimed in a 1995 article “For Better or for Worse” (published in Mortgage Banking; 56(1), 110) that a combination of technology and industry consolidation would drastically change the real estate landscape by the end of the 1990’s.

Schneider discussed technology changing the relationship between Realtors® and consumers such that through the development of technology, home sellers and buyers would be able to interact without the use of a real estate agent. He quoted John Moore, then president and CEO of Genesis Relocation Services, “If you can get the word out about your property efficiently to the mass market, you can avoid paying the full brokerage commission…” and “…within five years, most homes will be able to see listings around the country on interactive T.V.”

What Schneider described actually happened, and is now called “the internet.” The growth of the internet during the first decade of the 21st century allowed home buyers and sellers to interact with each other like no other time. The technology was a boon for those who decided to go it alone, and not hire a real estate agent.

Of course the internet was only a piece to the larger puzzle of the early 2000’s. It seems that for a very brief time, just placing a sign in the yard was enough to spread the word of your home sale. Deciding price, financing, and closing all seemed to be a “no-brainer.” But five years after the housing boom, it’s evident that not everyone can sell real estate “by owner.” Many moved back to hire a real estate agent.

One of the top reasons for selling or buying a home without a real estate agent is the perception of saving money. People who decide to sell without an agent don’t see the value of hiring an agent; while some buyers who decide to buy without an agent believe they can reduce their sale price by the commission amount.

Although hiring an agent may not be a god fit for some, many value what an agent can bring to the transaction. Real estate agents are housing-market experts; besides knowing neighborhood trends, they can provide detailed market analyses to assist in formulating a listing or sale price for home sellers or buyers. Agents facilitate offers, transactions, and negotiation. They are up to date on legislation affecting home buyers and sellers; agents know the seller’s/buyer’s obligations, including compulsory disclosures and forms. And of course, there is the time aspect (how much is your time worth?).

Reasons to hire a real estate agent

Talented real estate agents are sales and marketing specialists. These agents know how to interpret home sale data to determine a price, and the best times to list/buy your home. Additionally, they know how to prepare and present your home to prospective home buyers and promote it to grab home buyers’ attention.

Getting back to Schneider’s article, he concluded that regardless of technological advances and the inclination toward mergers to an increasingly centralized industry with few big players. It’s ultimately about nearby professionals who have the knowledge of the local market. It’s basically who can personally assist you through your transaction. Personal attention cannot be under-emphasized, especially when the transaction is demanding or emotionally charged.

Are you better off without a real estate agent? You might think that technology has made it easier for you to go it alone; but, if you want a relatively smooth transaction with little drama – hire a professional.

Original located at https://dankrell.com/blog/2013/01/24/thinking-of-buying-or-selling-a-home-without-an-agent-hire-a-professsional/

by Dan Krell
Google+
This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws. Copyright © 2013 Dan Krell.

July 25, 2012July 25, 2012

Debunking myths about foreclosures, timing the housing market, and hiring the “big name” agent

by Dan Krell ©2012
DanKrell.com

Debunking common real estate myths.

As a real estate agent, I often encounter people who talk about common and persistent real estate myths. In recent years, these few seem to be among the top myths:

Myth #1: “If you wait until the market bottoms out, you’ll get the best deal”
Counter point: “People trying to time the market may find in hindsight that they will have reacted either too soon or too late.”

Anderson & Harris, in their reveling study Timing the market: You don’t have to be perfect (Real Estate Issues 35, (3) (10): 42-42-50) indicated that you don’t have to be perfect when timing your purchase and sale of a home. They suggested that you could do just as well to aim your sale during market peaks and your purchase during market lows; however, they conceded that you would most likely know in hindsight when the market is at a peak or low.

Their results demonstrated that the typical “buy and hold strategy” over a thirty year period results in an annualized return of 8.18%; however, buying when a recession has ended with a predetermined sale period yields a wide range of return that ranged from 13.38% to 1.42% annualized total return.

Myth #2: “Buying a distressed home will result in a good purchase.”
Counter point: “There is inherent risk when purchasing distressed homes.”

There is inherent risk when purchasing distressed homes, regardless if they are foreclosures, bank owned homes, or even short sales. Although short sales are often occupied, foreclosures and bank owned homes are often vacant for many months; these homes are often sold “as-is; where is” meaning you are purchasing the home regardless of the condition of the home.

Besides the purchase and anticipated fix up costs, unanticipated repairs and expenses are often encountered. However without risk, there is no reward; due diligence, conducting inspections, and hiring the proper representation may reduce the risk and make your purchase a positive experience.

Myth #3: “The ‘big name’ agent with the most home buyers will sell my home quickest and for top dollar.”
Counter point: “Home buyers typically search for homes by characteristics and location, rather than searching for homes sold by individual agents or brokers.”

I have never had a home buyer tell me they want to see (or buy) a home because it is listed by a particular agent or broker. Rather, home buyers typically search homes by price, physical characteristics, amenities, and/or location. Home buyers will view your home if it matches their search criteria, regardless of who listed your home.

When interviewing listing agents, look beyond the sales pitch to list your home, and ask for real data and sources to back up claims. Agents will often not discuss the homes they could not sell; asking about the homes that did not sell as well as the reasons behind the non-sale may be more revealing than flatly accepting claims made by the agent. Asking for references of satisfied clients of homes that sold as well as homes that did not sell is useful to not only get a recommendation, but also understand how the agent conducts business. Ultimately, your home purchase or sale falls upon the experience and skill of the agent you hire.

More news and articles on “the Blog”
This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. This article was originally published in the Montgomery County Sentinel the week of July 23 , 2012. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws. Copyright © 2012 Dan Krell.

April 18, 2012September 22, 2018

Attractive real estate agents: the research and the hype

It is often said that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but a recent research article has the blogosphere a buzz questioning how attractive real estate agents can help you sell your home. The article was even posted on a National Association of Realtors® blog (realtor.org); posing the question, “do attractive real estate agents sell homes for more money?”

Do attractive real estate agents help sell your home faster?

The research conducted by Salter, Mixon & King, and published in the journal Applied Financial Economics, was titled “Broker beauty and boon: a study of physical attractiveness and its effect on real estate brokers’ income and productivity” (2012. vol. 22(10): p.p. 811-825). The research was not just an attempt at pop psychology, but rather it was one of the more recent attempts to establish how physical attractiveness affects income. The authors suggest, as stated in the abstract, that, “Results suggest that beauty augments more attractive agents’ wages and that more attractive agents use beauty to supplement classic production-related characteristics, such as effort, intelligence, and organizational skills.”

As the article makes its rounds on the internet, the results have most likely become misinterpreted and distorted. Although headlines might suggest that attractive agents sell homes at higher prices than others, however, the results could be interpreted that attractive agents may actually charge you more for their services rather than selling your home at a higher price (after all, the research is how beauty affects earnings). Additionally, as some have suggested that the results indicate less attractive agents sell homes quicker, beauty does not guarantee a quick sale (or satisfaction, as I describe below).

Although beauty is in the eye of the beholder, Hamermesh & Biddle state that there is empirical evidence that “beholders view beauty similarly” (1994. Beauty and the labor market. The American Economic Review, 84(5), 1174-1174.). They also acknowledge that beauty may “alter” other characteristics – and these variables are difficult to measure. Some variables that may be part of the “beauty quotient” might include facial structure, height and weight, while other variables may also include a person’s self esteem and confidence. Although Hamermesh & Biddle make it clear that there is a “penalty” in earnings for unattractiveness, they also acknowledge there may be “unobserved” characteristics associated with attractiveness that could account for increased earnings (they suggest a possible example is that increased earnings in adulthood with appearing physically attractive may be a result of a privileged background).

Do attractive real estate agents help sell for more money?

The phenomenon of increased earnings for the beautiful is not a new concept, but Salter, Mixon & King have indicated it is factual for real estate agents. But the attractiveness quotient is not clear cut as other factors (besides physical characteristics) are brought to the table, such as networking and communication skills, previous experiences, and professional image.

But wait- there’s more to the story! There is another body of research on contrast effects and physical attractiveness that suggests that when people are surrounded by beautiful people, happiness decreases (see: Michael Levine (2001). Why I hate Beauty. Psychology Today. 34,4). So, this could be interpreted to indicate that just because you hire an attractive real estate agent (quite possibly for a higher commission) – your satisfaction is not guaranteed.

Do attractive real estate agents make more commission?

The bottom line: stick with the basics when hiring a real estate agent; which include (among other things) asking trusted sources (such as friends and relatives) for a referral , and ask agent about their license and qualifications as well as recent references.

Original published at https://dankrell.com/blog/2012/04/18/beauty-attractiveness-and-real-estate-agents-the-research-and-the-hype/

By Dan Krell

February 24, 2011July 25, 2019

Can you depend on your real estate agent?

The trite idiom, “what you don’t know won’t hurt you,” is not the catch phrase you want your real estate agent to embrace. However, home buyers and sellers are often confronted with issues that often fall into this category, but should not prevent you from asking for more information or consulting with your attorney. Some common top red flag situations include guidance regarding contracts and addenda, having an agent insist you hire their vendor, and receiving an offer to purchase with conflicting information.

Although it is recommended that a home buyer and seller consult with their attorney to explain a listing or sales contract as well as addenda, the reality is consumers often rely on their agent’s understanding and explanation of the forms they sign. An example of this is the first time Maryland home buyer addendum. Besides the fact that a first time Maryland home buyers have their portion of the state transfer tax paid by the seller, the Annotated Code of Maryland (14-104 (c) – Real Property) states that the recordation and local transfer tax is to be paid by the seller unless both parties agree to a different arrangement. Even though section 14-104 (c) is clearly stated on the first time Maryland homebuyer addendum, I am increasingly hearing how some first time home buyers were not made aware of this opportunity. One home buyer recently told me they fired their agent because after reading the addendum to their agent, the agent told the buyer that transfer taxes are automatically split between buyer and seller regardless. Although it may have been true that first time Maryland home buyers often waived this opportunity during a seller’s market, it is increasingly being asserted in today’s buyer’s market.

Another red flag situation is when an agent insists a home buyer use a specific provider. For example, it is not uncommon for some buyer agents to compel their clients to hire a home inspector they use on a regular basis; the agent wants to ensure that the deal will not be jeopardized by an inspector pointing out too many concerns. I have heard home owners regretting having hired their agents’ home inspector without an interview or checking into their credentials, because of issues that turn up after closing. Additionally, some home inspectors will recount stories of how they have been pressured by buyer agents to not report items on the home inspection report so as not to “kill” the deal.

For home sellers, a red flag situation arises when they receive a purchase offer with inconsistent terms. Listing agents are often given offers that have inconsistent information, such as deposit checks amounts that conflict with the contract, or loan approval letters that are written for less than the purchase price. Sometimes, after digging a little deeper, is not uncommon to find out that the lender is not licensed to do business in Maryland, or the deposit check bounced. Without the proper information, the seller cannot make a solid decision.

Although you might think your real estate agent should be looking out for you best interest, intentionally or unintentionally- it is not always the case. Although, seemingly innocent or harmless situations can sometimes raise a red flag in your mind, most resolve without issue; however, it should not prevent you from asking for additional information, clarification, asking for credentials, and/or a consultation with your attorney.

By Dan Krell
Copyright © 2011

This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.

February 9, 2011July 18, 2019

Does your agent have a duty to you – or their pocketbook during an open house?

I received an email from my local association indicating that there is a revised disclosure form. This is not unusual, as forms are often revised for various reasons. Often times, new forms or revisions to existing forms are often made when there are changes to real estate laws and practice thereof; or when issues arise in specific practice areas (either because of a significant lawsuit or someone received too many complaints). This time, however, the Maryland Real Estate Commission (MREC) most likely updated and clarified the agency relationship form “Understanding Whom Real Estate Agents Represent” because of complaints of agents’ behaviors (regarding their agency relationship) while conducting open houses.

The purpose of these “agency” forms are to protect consumers as well as inform of an agent’s and broker’s duty to their client. I’m not an attorney, however, I believe that the agency disclosure also provides the agent a reminder of their duty. To be fair, many brokers and agents understand their duties and their commitment to their clients. However, there are some that do not; and unfortunately, I cannot say that they know who they are.

An “agency relationship” is defined by COMAR (Title 17 – Real Estate Brokers) §17-528 as a “relationship in which a licensee acts for or represents another person with the person’s authority in a residential real estate transaction.” Further, §17-530 states; “A licensee who participates in a residential real estate transaction as a seller’s agent, buyer’s agent, or as a cooperating agent shall disclose in writing that the licensee represents the seller or lessor or the buyer or lessee.”

It appears that there are reports of agents who conduct open houses for the purpose of steering buyers their way by making disparaging remarks about the home, as well as exhibiting other subtle behaviors that may be construed as inappropriate. An explanatory letter from the MREC describes such behaviors and clarifies how agents should conduct themselves during an open house. Besides reports of agents sitting with their laptops at the ready to show buyers other homes; according to the letter, some agents have openly admitted that their goal was to recruit home buyers while sitting an open house for a listing agent. According to the MREC, this can be a violation of the agent’s duty of loyalty to the seller; “any agent affiliated with the listing broker who holds an open house is there exclusively as the seller’s agent.”

To further clarify the agency relationship, the revised “Understand Whom Agents Represent” form states “If you are viewing a property listed by the company with whom the agent accompanying you is affiliated, and you have not signed a ‘Consent for Dual Agency’ form, that agent is representing the seller.” To attempt to circumvent this issue, some agents have had their seller clients sign a waiver of agency for open houses. However, the MREC makes it clear that an “agency waiver” is prohibited under Maryland law.

The MREC states that although it is improper to solicit a buyer while sitting in an open house, it is acceptable for agents who conducted the open house for a listing agent to contact those unrepresented home buyers another time and place. The MREC website (www.dllr.state.md.us/license/mrec) provides additional consumer real estate related information, including agency relationships.

By Dan Krell
Copyright © 2011

Comments are welcome. This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.

Reasons to hire a real estate agent

by Dan Krell ©2012 DanKrell.com

Debunking common real estate myths.

As a real estate agent, I often encounter people who talk about common and persistent real estate myths. In recent years, these few seem to be among the top myths:

by Dan Krell ©2012
DanKrell.com