Negotiating home repairs

During the housing boom last decade, it seemed as if problems that killed real estate deals were rare. Appraisals almost never came in low, and if it did the buyer gladly paid cash for the difference between the sales price and the appraised value. Loan denials were also rare, because mortgages were easier to obtain. And of course, the home condition almost never seemed a problem because many people forwent home inspections.

Today, however, buying and selling a home feels different than it did in those halcyon days. Although the process remains the same, the rules have somewhat changed. Buyers are more apt to ask the seller to address issues that arise along the way, including problems with the home’s condition. Both the buyer and seller need to be aware of property condition issues that may arise as well as being prepared when encountered.

Home buyers are looking for their perfect home, while sellers already view their home as such. Because of this subjective view, it seems as if home buyers are “walking away” more often these days because they cannot come to terms with the seller on property condition repair items.

Home sellers generally have progressed over the last few years such that they are more open to a buyer’s request to address reasonable and necessary repairs. However, it is not uncommon for repair negotiations to end in a “take it or leave it” scenario when the buyer’s request is deemed excessive by the seller.

The termite inspection can also create tension between buyers and sellers, even though sellers usually treat infestations and/or repair resulting damage. Many buyers and sellers do not realize that the termite inspection is somewhat of a misnomer because the inspection not only checks for termites, but searches for evidence of any wood destroying insects (such as: termites, carpenter ants, and powder post beetles) as well as reporting damage. Infestation of termites and other wood destroying insects can occur anytime in the life of a home; if left untreated, an infestation can feast on a home leaving behind costly damage and in cases left untreated for many years- possibly an uninhabitable home.

Another source of a property condition inspection, that most buyers and sellers are unaware of, originates from the buyer’s lender. Mortgage lenders require the home to meet minimum condition standards, which is reported on the appraisal; the appraiser will “inspect” the home for the lender. For conventional mortgages, the appraiser will rate the overall condition as well as possibly noting condition flaws (such as structural deficits and utility connections). A poor rating will typically raise a red flag for the underwriter to require repairs prior to closing.

FHA and VA appraisers not only rate the home’s condition, they will also list all deficiencies that do not meet minimum underwriting condition requirements to be addressed prior to closing. The list of deficiencies is provided to the buyer, who in turn typically addresses with the seller. The seller can agree or refuse to make repairs; however, the contract is sometimes voided when neither the buyer nor seller agrees to make the repairs.

When it comes to property condition repairs, buyers and sellers should be prepared for extra rounds of negotiations. However, surprises and further negotiation can be minimized if both sides are prepared and understand the scope of the required property condition repairs.

By Dan Krell
Copyright © 2011

This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.

Planning to de-clutter

De-cluttering your home is not just reserved for a home sale. It’s also a bit more than just a thorough cleaning and putting away items that are not in use. You may already be overwhelmed by the thought of cleaning, but remember that if you prepare a realistic plan and stick to it, you will be finished before you know it.

When going through each room, decide which items are necessities and which items need to go. There are many items that you may decide are not necessary to keep, yet they are personal or sentimental. Professional home stagers talk about the idea of “depersonalization” when discussing de-cluttering. This means that the home should be “neutralized” so, rather than view your life and personalization, home buyers can have a vision of the home as their own. Keeping depersonalization in mind, decide which items need to go.

Remember that de-cluttering doesn’t necessarily mean that you dispose of everything you don’t need or want in your home. Many of your personal and sentimental items you wish to keep can be stored temporarily or for long periods of time. You can rent storage units of various sizes on a monthly basis, or you may decide to have a portable storage container delivered to your home. The portable storage container is a practical solution if many of the items that you’re pulling from your home will be used in your new home. Additionally, if you’re move is not immediate, the portable storage container can be transported by the company to storage until you’re ready to unload the container in your new home.

The items you decide that you no longer need or want can be donated, disposed of, or you might even decide to have a yard sale! If you have many items that need to be removed from your home, consider donating the items to a charity before throwing it all away. Since many charities vary on what is acceptable for donation, it’s a good idea to check with them before scheduling a pick up or dropping items off to their collection site.

Be careful when throwing items away; you may need to take precautions or make separate disposal plans for certain materials. Some items that cannot be picked up by the regular trash collection can be scheduled for pick up by the county or local municipality; or can be hauled to the local processing facility. If you’re unsure how to dispose of certain items, you can check with the Montgomery County Division of Solid Waste Services for facility hours and disposal/recycle procedures.

If you don’t have the time to haul your unwanted items on your own, you may decide to hire a hauling company. Charges to haul items away can vary depending on the company, as well as how they dispose of the items. Some haulers may drop everything to a county processing center, while some may sort your items either for donation or sale.

De-cluttering is the keystone to your home’s presentation. De-cluttering a home may sound laborious, but it doesn’t have to be if you have a realistic plan. If you’re unsure how to begin de-cluttering your home, you can check with your Realtor® or you can hire a Professional Organizer. The National Association of Professional Organizers (napo.net) maintains a national directory of Professional Organizers.

by Dan Krell
© 2011

This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.

Can timing the real estate market help you get a better deal?

If you’re trying to time the market before buying or selling your home, you may decide to wait a little longer after hearing the recent housing data; however, you could also change your mind when you consider some recent research.

First, a recent housing report released May 8th by Zillow.com indicates further erosion of home values. According to Zillow.com’s chief economist Stan Humphries, home values continue to slide nationwide – except for the metro areas of Honolulu, HI (there was a slight increase in home values in March 2011 compared to the same time last year) and Pittsburgh, PA (where home values have been determined to be flat for the time period) (Zillow.com).

Even the Washington, DC metropolitan appears to have taken a hit. According to Zillow.com, area home values declined 0.5% in March 2011 compared to February 2011; and declined 7% in March 2011 compared to March 2010.

Humphries further stated that housing demand continues to be “fundamentally weak;” while housing supply is and will continue to be affected by distressed properties due to higher than normal delinquency rates (which are expected to continue into the near future).

Given the less than rosy picture of the housing market, those doubting the long term value of home ownership may continue to wait out the market. But a recent research article by Anderson & Harris (2010. Timing the market: You don’t have to be perfect. Real Estate Issues 35, (3) (10): 42-42-50) may indicate that you don’t have to be perfect when timing your purchase and sale of your home.

Anderson & Harris studied various strategies of purchasing and selling commercial real estate to determine if there is a significant difference in return. Their strategy simulation provided these results: the typical “buy and hold strategy” over a thirty year period results in an annualized return of 8.18%; however, buying when a recession has ended with a predetermined sale period yields a wide range of return that ranged from 13.38% to 1.42% annualized total return. Alternatively, timing your purchase and sale with the overall peaks and valleys of the market could be more effective than trying to be exact; although they concede that peaks and valleys are realized in hindsight.

Although their data analyzed commercial real estate investor behavior, the results may have implications for the housing market. As the data suggests, attempting to exactly time your purchase and sale can yield a wide range of unpredictable results; while a long term strategy appears to be more stable. Additionally, they caution that market timing can also be affected by macroeconomic factors as well as your personal financial picture; which can reverse positive returns, even if your timing was perfect.

Anderson & Harris’ data may indicate that attempting to time your purchase may not yield the results you might expect; long term home ownership can be as good, if not better, than speculating on the exact bottom or top of the housing market. Likewise, home sellers waiting for the housing market to rebound before making a move may be missing an opportunity as well.

Obviously, you should consult financial professionals before making any financial decision; as well as consulting a Realtor® to assist you in analyzing local and neighborhood sale data. However, if you’re trying to time the housing market, consider a long term approach before making your decision.

by Dan Krell
© 2011

This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.

Has the market hit bottom yet?

I have to admit that after offering definitively optimistic analyses about the housing market after the meltdown, I now answer housing market questions tentatively. The tentative answer is not for a lack of optimism (the local market has shown strength in the last year where other regions continue to languish at best); however current analyses are tentative because rather than making a decision to buy or sell a home strictly on the strength of the market, consumers also need to be aware of personal goals and preferences.

Sure, if you look at some of the housing market indicators, such as the S&P/Case Shiller Home Price Index and the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) existing home sale report, national data are conflicting and may not yet indicate a solid recovery (although the Washington, D.C. regional data has shown strength).

The last S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index (standardandpoors.com) data that was released March 29th indicated that national home prices have not fared well for January 2011. However, it must be pointed out that as home prices slid across most of the country, the Washington, D.C. region’s home prices revealed an annual increase of 3.6%.

The NAR’s February existing home sale report released March 21st indicated a further decline for the number of homes that sold compared to the same time the previous year. However, the Washington, D.C. region was reported to have increased in home sales but decreased in home prices compared to the same time the previous year. We are anxiously waiting for this month’s report, which is scheduled to be released this week (realtor.org).

Additionally, the April NAHB/Wells Fargo Home Market Index (HMI) fell to 16; as reported in the April 18th press release by the National Association of Home Builders (nahb.org). The HMI is a scale from 0 to 100 that rates builder sentiment across the country (the lowest index reported was 9 in 2009; the highest index was 77 reported in the late 1990’s). NAHB Chairman Bob Nielsen was reported as saying in the press release, “While builders in some areas are starting to see a pickup in traffic of prospective home buyers, many consumers remain skittish about the health of the housing market and overall economy, particularly in view of recent legislative and regulatory proposals that could make it much harder to get a mortgage…”

Economists and other housing experts remain conflicted about sources for the continued issues facing the national housing market. Some point to continued problems with distressed home sales, which include foreclosures and short sales; while others continue to point to unemployment. The reality is that these economic factors are just a part of a larger puzzle. Other economic forces that can affect consumer sentiment and the housing market can range from mortgage regulation (as recognized by Bob Neilson of the NAHB) all the way to energy shocks and policy (one of Shell’s energy scenarios named “Scramble” predicts major global economic difficulties as early as 2020 unless serious energy policies are undertaken).

Has the housing market bottomed out? Macro-economic factors may indicate that housing could continue to manifest symptoms of a labile global economy; while micro-economic factors might indicate a completely different picture. For someone contemplating buying or selling a home, the answer is probably more of a personal reflection combined with local and hyper-local housing data.

By Dan Krell Copyright © 2011

This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.

What’s Next for Housing Finance Market Reform

No one said change is easy, however it’s necessary. That thought is reflected in the Treasury Department’s (Treasury.gov) white paper entitled, “Reforming America’s Housing Finance Market.” The white paper, released last Friday, is an assessment of the housing market and offers proposals for reforming the mortgage markets. Being the most significant reform of the housing finance markets in 80 years, the main points for this reform are to create a robust mortgage market by “winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” and “increase the role of private capital.”

Although it was admitted that housing finance reform “will make credit less easily available than before the crisis,” experts agree that reform is necessary. However, that’s where the consensus ends; for you see, there is disagreement about what kind of reforms are to be realized. Industry groups such as the National Association of Realtors® (Realtor.org) and the Mortgage Bankers Association (mortgagebankers.org) hail mortgage market reform, but offer slightly different solutions.

Two extreme positions of reform are complete privatization and nationalization; the white paper contrasts each with the notion that actual reform would be somewhere between the two. A complete privatization of the mortgage market would limit access to financing as well as increasing financing costs; while a nationalization of the mortgage market would increase taxpayer risk and market distortion.

As possible solutions, the white paper weighs several proposals against four criteria: access to mortgage credit; incentive to invest in the housing sector; taxpayer protection; and economic stability. The best path is described as a “balance of [these] priorities.”

The options discussed are several versions of option 1, which is: “privatizing housing finance but with government insurance limited to FHA, USDA and Department of Veterans’ Affairs for a narrowly targeted group of borrowers.” The stated benefits of this option include minimizing market distortions and limiting “moral hazards” within the lending industry. Although this option would reduce risk in private markets, there is concern that it may cause capital to retreat from housing into other economic sectors (which could have an undesirable effect on home prices). Additional concerns include increased mortgage costs, restricted access to the 30-year pre-payable mortgage, and the inability for the government to quickly respond to a credit crisis.

Option 2 is the same as option 1, but with a guarantee mechanism that would engage in a crisis. This would address the inability of a swift government intervention in option one; however there is a risk of increased moral hazard.

The 3rd and final option proposed in the white paper is same as option 1, but with catastrophic reinsurance behind significant private capital. (Reinsurance is the purchase and re-issue of mortgage insurance from mortgage insurance companies, which transfers the risk of the loans). This option has the government role as reinsuring mortgage securities, which is thought to reduce financing costs by increasing the flow of capital to mortgage markets. Although the Stated benefits of this option include affordable 30-year pre-payable mortgages for the average home buyer, as well as allowing small lenders to participate in the mortgage market; there are some concerns, which include the possibility of creating another housing bubble by artificially inflating housing prices due to the increased investment flowing into the housing sector.

Although it’s inevitable, there is no clear path to housing finance market reform; which means that the road ahead may be bumpy.

By Dan Krell.
Copyright © 2011

Comments are welcome. This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.