Real Estate News and Commentary

November 6, 2009June 27, 2019

Fannie Mae in the Rental market?

Although the new “Deed for Lease” program may not be considered nationalized housing, it comes close to the scenario I envisioned back in March:

“Rather than the Government entering the mortgage servicing arena, the ideal nationalized housing program (through Government controlled lenders) would allow struggling home owners to pay what they can afford. In return the home owner would give up some (if not all) of the future equity stake in their home when they eventually sell.”

https://dankrell.com/blog/2009/03/03/nationalize-housing/

Yesterday (November 6), Fannie Mae announced the “Deed for Lease Program.” The program is designed for homeowners who are in foreclosure and do not qualify for a mortgage modification. The home owner is supposed to give their home to their lender via a “deed in lieu” (also known as a “friendly foreclosure”) and be allowed to rent back from the lender. Program guidelines and other information can be obtained from Fannie Mae’s news release: http://www.fanniemae.com/

November 5, 2009July 18, 2019

Senate passes home buyer tax credit legislation

Yesterday (November 4th), the Senate passed legislation to extend and expand the home buyer tax credit. The $8,000 first time home buyer tax credit continues; AND adding a “move up” buyer tax credit of $6,500 (both to sunset April 30, 2010). The new legislation is certainly going to continue helping first time home buyers, as well as helping many move up home buyers who are struggling with their own liquidity.

Surely, many home buyers will take advantage of the tax credit to assist them in their purchases. Although there is a direct and immediate effect of the home buyer credit, many continue to debate its affects. Many have voiced their opinion about the pros and cons.

By Dan Krell
Copyright © 2009

November 4, 2009October 5, 2019

Get proactive to sell your home!

Proactive home selling

The 2008 edition of the National Association of Realtors “Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers” indicates that a home’s condition and environmental impact are important to many home buyers. In a market where home buyers are hard to come by, your home may stand out from the crowd if you can demonstrate that your home is solid and energy efficient.

Some believe home buying to be an emotional process that is rationalized by making decisions on perceived value. Conducting pre-sale inspections, such as a home inspection and a home energy audit, can not only provide home buyers with the rationale for choosing your home, the physical data may provide home buyers an additional boost of confidence that can make their decision process easier.

NAR surveys indicated that home buyers are more apt to compromise on the price than the condition of a home (NAR Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers 2008). Be prepared by conducting a pre-sale home inspection. The inspection can provide information on the general condition of the home by examining the age and functionality of the home’s major systems including (but not limited to) roof and gutters, heating and cooling, plumbing, electric, and possibly point out any visible structural defects that may need attention. Some home sellers may also decide to conduct additional environmental tests (such as radon and lead) to possibly alleviate further concerns.

As energy prices continue to rise, home buyers are increasingly aware of home energy efficiency. NAR surveys indicated that 43% of home buyers consider a home’s heating and cooling costs important factors in their home search (NAR Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers 2008). You may allay home buyer fears of purchasing an inefficient home by conducting a home energy audit. Besides revealing the energy efficiency of your home’s furnace, A/C, and major appliances, conducting a home energy audit will also provide information on the home’s efficiency of maintaining temperature. Professional home energy auditors use state of the art equipment (such as infrared cameras and blower doors) to identify often hard to detect air loss or penetration from walls, windows, and doors.

Although some home sellers have the financial resources to make major renovations to their homes to attract home buyers, most do not. The pre-sale inspections can provide you with useful information that may assist you in preparing your home prior to listing by allowing you prioritize the items that need attention. The pre-sale inspections can identify the strong and weak points of your home; you can be prepared for making repairs and/or updates of any unsatisfactory conditions that are identified. However, if you are selling your home “as-is,” the inspections can help you price your home by accounting for any necessary repairs or updates.

By proactively attending to necessary repairs, you can limit the amount of negotiating a home buyer may initiate from their home inspections; or avoid having a home buyer walk away from the deal due to an unsatisfactory home inspection. However, you must remember that although you may be enticing a home buyer by providing pre-sale inspection results, you are still required to disclose any known latent defects in your home (defects that would not reasonably be expected to be observed by a careful visual inspection and pose a health or safety threat).

This column is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. This article was originally published in the Montgomery County Sentinel the week of October 26, 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dan Krell

November 3, 2009October 5, 2019

Hearings on residential and commercial real estate crises

On November 2, 2009, The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Domestic Policy began witness testimony on the hearing entitled “Examining the Continuing Crisis in Residential Foreclosures and the Emerging Commercial Real Estate Crisis: Perspectives from Atlanta.”

You can read the interesting opening testimony on the subcommittee’s website:

The witnesses seem to be a cross section of those involved in the real estate industry. Interestingly, each perspective on the cause of the real estate bubble burst and its effects on the current recession (and vice verse) are different. Among the witness testimony, one blames all lenders for predatory lending practices, one blames large lenders for not lending in the current climate with government TARP funds, one blames excessive government regulation for not allowing small local banks provide loans because they are deemed “high priced…”

November 2, 2009October 5, 2019

Will home buyer tax credit replace mortgage interest deduction?

Tax credit or deduction?

The mortgage interest tax deduction (MID) has been around for a long time. In fact, the MID (along with other interest tax deductions) was allowed since 1913. Throughout its history there have been many considerations to increase tax revenue by reducing, eliminating or phasing out the MID. In recent years, the Bush administration considered alternatives to the MID, and now the Obama administration is considering the options on the disposition of the MID.

In its August 2009 report to the House and Senate Committees on the Budget (Budget Options, Volume 2), the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) presented suggested options to assist policy makers in the budget process. Included in the report was their proposal for the MID. Much like the previous’ administration’s considered changes to the MID, the CBO’s report discussed either reducing the MID beginning in 2013 (as the CBO report states, “when the housing markets are expected to have recovered from their current turmoil”), or converting the MID to a home buyer tax credit (CBO.gov).

Proposed changes to the MID have typically been met with strong opposition by housing proponents, such as the National Association of Realtors and the National Association of Home Builders. During the Bush Administration’s contemplation of reducing the MID, then NAR President, Al Mansell, sent a letter to the President’s Advisory Panel on Tax Reform stating reasons for not changing the MID. Mansell’s letter makes many points in favor of the MID, among them include that the tax system supports homeownership and makes homeownership affordable. Additionally, the removal of the MID may cause a deflationary spiral of home prices (keep in mind this letter was dated October 14, 2005).

MID opposition include many economists who challenge the need for continuing the MID with arguments that the MID does not promote home ownership (and may in fact contribute to the inflation of “affordable” housing), and (contrary to claims that it helps lower to middle income home owners) a disproportionately larger number of home owners who claim the MID are in the upper income brackets.

Studies that present housing data indicate that the MID has little to no effect on home ownership. One such study, a 2007 report by the California Legislative Analyst Office (www.lao.ca.gov), indicated that home ownership rates were higher than the national average in the eight states that do not allow for a state MID. Additionally, the report cited other studies that showed there was no clear relationship between the MID and national homeownership rates as their variances over a forty year period were not congruent.

The California Legislative Analyst Office study also reported income data that corroborated a 2006 study by the Tax Foundation (taxfoundation.org) that a higher proportion of home owners who use the MID are in the upper income brackets. The Tax Foundation study analyzed 2003 IRS data that indicated that a significantly higher percentage of home owners (nationwide) who claimed the MID had an adjusted gross income of $75,000 or more.

Proposed changes to the MID are always controversial, but the timing may right for such a change. The ultimate demise of the MID may come from an unlikely source gaining additional support to boost the housing market- the first time home buyer tax credit.