Dual agency debate continues; revealing results from recent real estate research

by Dan Krell © 2013
Google+
DanKrell.com

home salesUnderstanding representation in a real estate transaction can sometimes be tricky. You might think, after all, “If I work with a real estate agent, they represent me.” Not so fast; understanding whom real estate agents represent can be confusing in some situations, most notable is the concept of dual agency.

Maryland, like many other jurisdictions around the country, allows for dual agency. “The possibility of dual agency,” as described on the Maryland Real Estate Commission website (www.dllr.state.md.us/license/mrec/mrecrep.shtml), “…arises when the buyer’s agent and the seller’s agent both work for the same real estate company, and the buyer is interested in property listed by that company. The real estate broker or the broker’s designee, is called the “dual agent.” Dual agents do not act exclusively in the interests of either the seller or buyer, and therefore cannot give undivided loyalty to either party. There may be a conflict of interest because the interests of the seller and buyer may be different or adverse” [emphasis added].

Dual agency has been widely debated since its inception. And as the industry rapidly transforms, the issue is likely to continue to be a hot topic; for example, as real estate teams have become more prevalent in the marketplace, many argue that the potential for conflicts of interest in dual agency transactions becomes increasingly significant.

In his February 2010 Agbeat.com article (February 16, 2010; The Age Old Dual Agency in Real Estate Debate), Patrick Flynn states that although dual agency is legal in many jurisdictions, “…dual Agency is the ultimate no win scenario. Even if all parties agree in writing (and if you explained the likely pitfalls and risks to both parties…they never would agree) you simply cannot perform your prescribed duties…

He continues to say that although there is potential for damage and irreparable harm to those involved in a dual agency transaction, most of these transactions close “without a hitch;” and the agent’s attention moves from common sense and integrity to the “little devil” on their shoulder that tells them, “Look at all the money you made!

Recent research, investigating whether dual agency transactions are a result of agent incentives (e.g., money) or efficiency, suggests that the issue deserves further investigation to understand (among other things) the effects of dual agency, potential for conflicts, and to determine if buyers and sellers are poorly informed. Regardless, Brastow & Waller conclude in their 2013 study (Dual agency representation: Incentive conflicts or efficiencies? The Journal of Real Estate Research, 35(2), 199-222) that dual agency is more likely to occur at the beginning and end of a listing contract. When a dual agency sale occurs at the beginning of a listing, they conclude that it is a result of agent incentive and results in an efficient quick sale. However, when a dual agency sale occurs at the end of a listing contract it is usually due to agent incentive (e.g., avoiding loss of sale) and the home is more likely to sell for less.

Locally, the Maryland Real Estate Commission requires that real estate licensees, who are assisting you, provide disclosures describing agency relationships (including dual agency) “at the time of the first scheduled face to face contact with you.” Your agent can assist you in understanding dual agency, when it occurs, the potential issues of dual agency, as well as what should happen if you decide to not agree to dual agency.

More news and articles on “the Blog”

Disclaimer.  This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Readers should not rely solely on the information contained herein, as it does not purport to be comprehensive or render specific advice.  Readers should consult with an attorney regarding local real estate laws and customs as they vary by state and jurisdiction.  This article was originally published the week of September 9, 2013 (Montgomery County Sentinel). Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws. Copyright © 2013 Dan Krell.

A glimpse into home buyer and seller behaviors

homes for sale

Buying and selling a home can be one of the most expensive and complex transactions you may undertake in your lifetime. Many are increasingly seeking assistance from real estate agents; according to the Highlights of the 2012 National Association of Realtors® Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers (realtor.org), eighty-nine percent of home buyers purchased their home through a real estate agent (a substantial increase from the sixty-one percent who indicated they purchased through an agent in 2001), while eighty-eight percent of sellers listed with an agent.

If you plan to hire a real estate agent, conventional wisdom dictates that you should interview several before choosing an agent. However, the logic is countered by the survey results. Approximately two-thirds of home buyers and sellers only contacted one agent. Additionally, a majority of buyers and sellers reported that the top means of finding their real estate agent was through a referral from a friend or family member. Forty percent of home buyers and thirty-eight percent of sellers found their agent through a referral from a family member or friend. First time home buyers were most reliant on their friends’ and family members’ referrals.

Repeat business was also a frequent way indicated in choosing a real estate agent. Although ninety percent of home buyers and eight-four percent of sellers reported that they would work with their agent again in the future; only twenty-three percent of home sellers and ten percent of buyers reported that they had worked with their agent in the past.

The internet is increasingly viewed as an important source of information for home buyers. Ninety percent of buyers surveyed indicated that they used the internet for their home search; the percentage rose to ninety-six for buyers under the age of 44.

Ultimately, your home purchase or sale falls upon the experience and skill of the agent you hire. Because of the increase in specialized transactions (such as short sales, 1031 exchanges, etc), it is probably a good idea to find out if the agent has the experience if your purchase or sale falls in this category.

A recent research study by Bennie Waller and Ali Jubran (“The Impact of Agent Experience on the Real Estate Transaction.” Journal of Housing Research 21, no. 1 (2012): 67-82) highlights the notion that an experienced agent can yield a better result than an inexperienced agent. They concluded that hiring a “veteran” agent will have a positive effect on your home sale. The data indicates that “rookie” agents, those who have had their real estate license two years or less, sell homes for less, take longer to sell homes, and are less efficient during the process.

Asking friends and family for referrals as well as calling the agent you previously worked with is a good way to find a real estate agent. However, vetting out potential issues can be achieved by asking the right questions before you hire them.

Regardless of how you find your real estate agent, it is probably a good idea to find out more about them. A conversation about their experience, knowledge, and expertise is probably a good way to start. Additionally, knowledge about the local market is extremely important these days as market trends have become hyper-local. Not understanding the neighborhood market can lead an agent to over or under price a home.

by Dan Krell
© 2013

Protected by Copyscape Web Plagiarism Detector

This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws. Copyright © 2013 Dan Krell.

Home buyer’s privacy

Buyer InformationIn a time when there is increasing concerned about personal privacy, maybe it’s time for local Realtor® associations (such as the Greater Capital Area Association of Realtors®) to retire the Buyer’s Financial Information Sheet, or at least make major revisions to the form. The Buyer’s Financial Information Sheet is an invitation for abuse and misuse by those who may otherwise be well intentioned.

Sure, privacy laws have been recently enacted that prescribe protocols on the handling and disposal of sensitive personal information. However, there are no provisions to ensure that real estate brokers, agents, and those who have access to the personal data follow such precautions.

If you ask a real estate broker about the origination of the Buyer’s Financial Information Sheet, they might explain how agents needed a means to pre-qualify buyers in a time when loan officers’ pre-qualification letters had little meaning on their own. The tradition of a completed form portrays the buyer’s ability to purchase a home. Legal minds might go further to explain that the form may provide additional recourse for the home seller in case the buyer provides misleading and/or false information, and/or omits relevant information about their financial standing.

Today, many home buyers are pushing back (and rightly so) at the request to provide an abundance of specific financial and personal information to their agents, listing agents and sellers. For many home buyers, the resistance to sharing personal and financial information is not only because of discretion, but mainly because they feel the sharing of the information is redundant and ineffectual. Many home buyers have already provided similar (if not more) information to their loan officer so as to be issued a pre-qualification letter. Additional concerns include the use of buyer financial information to during contract negotiations.

Times change, and it’s time to take home buyer financial information out of the hands of real estate agents. The argument that sellers want to see the buyer’s ability to purchase is antiquated. Today, mortgage originators are licensed and take seriously approvals that are issued because consumers may have recourse; the loan officer usually performs a minimal level of due diligence.

Mortgage originators are required to undergo a federal and state criminal background checks for licensing. Additionally, lenders offer training on managing and disposing sensitive personal information; many lenders offer secure means of electronic transmission of sensitive data. Chances are that the agents involved in your transaction did not undergo a recent background check, much less the seller. But if you are asked to complete said form, you are expected to trust those who may handle and view it.

Additional problems that can occur when presented with the Buyer’s Financial Information Sheet include the compulsion by listing agents and home sellers to underwrite the buyer’s mortgage; they may indulge in deciding whether or not the buyer is mortgage worthy when they may be unqualified to do so. Additionally, listing agents and sellers are tempted to use the buyer’s financial information in negotiations; misguided sellers may regrettably lose a deal when they are told to hold out for a higher price from a buyer who may walk away from negotiation.

Protect home buyers and sellers: retire or change the Buyer’s Financial Information Sheet. Cash buyers can still provide proof of funds to purchase, while other buyers can provide a lender’s letter along with a “Buyer’s Financial Affidavit” that certifies that all information provided to their lender is accurate.

Original published at https://dankrell.com/blog/2013/08/21/home-buyers-privacy-an-argument-to-retire-the-financial-information-sheet/

By Dan Krell
Google+
Like on Facebook
Follow on Twitter

This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws. Copyright ©2013 Dan Krell.

The next real estate technology breakthrough

by Dan Krell © 2013
Google+
DanKrell.com

Real estate predictionsBesides face to face meetings, the telephone was the only way real estate agents could communicate with their clients up until about 1990.  By the mid 1990’s the fax machine was a fixture in every real estate office and was a major method to send home listings and contract addenda to clients.  By the housing boom in 2004, large numbers of home buyers turned to the internet to get the latest home listings before other buyers; and during that time, many real estate brokers and agents were taking to the internet finding rudimentary uses for email marketing.

Much like the advances in previous technologies that made the “business” of real estate easier, current advances also seek to make the process increasingly convenient and efficient.  Before the internet was widely used, the increasing abilities of fax transmissions made communication faster and more accurate.  And even though there has not been a major technological advent since the internet, the internet experience has much improved due to the exponential advances in computing power as well as widespread wi-fi access and increasing bandwidth.

Ten years ago, most home buyers and sellers used their desktop computer to access the internet; mobile computing was somewhat in its infancy.  Advances in mobile technologies, including smart phones, have untethered home buyers and sellers; they now have access to real estate information at their finger tips any time of day, wherever there is a signal.  Additionally, real estate websites can now send listing alerts via text messages.   Technically known as “short messaging service” or sms, texting is not only allowing  the “set and forget” convenience of the home search, but allows anyone to communicate contract details and showing instructions with minimal effort.

The internet as a platform has really changed the home buying and selling experience.  Home buyers and sellers don’t have to wait for their agent to send listing information; and because they don’t have to meet with their agents to sign documents, fax machines have basically become obsolete.

Electronic signing is a technology that is becoming increasingly popular, especially for those who have busy schedules.  The technology allows a person to review and electronically sign a document it via the internet.   Too bad for Fed-Ex, as e-signing has all but eliminated the need to send packages of documents to be signed; most notably, the use of electronic signatures has made the process easier for international home buyers and sellers.

It might seem as if technology is not only allowing consumers to conduct the business of real estate with increasing convenience and efficiency, but also lessening the reliance on real estate professionals.  Ten years ago, most home buyers relied solely on their real estate agent for home listings.  Today, however, a majority of home buyers search the internet for home listings and public information.

However, as information is increasingly available, real estate professionals have become even more relied upon to decipher and provide perspective to the information that consumers are accessing.  A real estate agent’s role is continually changing from the information “gate-keeper” to information analyst.

So, I don’t expect real estate agents to be replaced by androids or Star-Trekesque holo-decks in ten years time; however, new technologies will continue to make the home buying and selling process easier and increasingly efficient.  But, who knows, maybe one day the holo-deck could allow buyers and sellers, who are thousands of miles apart, to attend settlement together.

More news and articles on “the Blog”
Protected by Copyscape Web Plagiarism Detector
This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. This article was originally published the week of June 17, 2013 (Montgomery County Sentinel). Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws. Copyright © 2013 Dan Krell.

Your real estate agent’s experience is more important than you know

by Dan Krell © 2013
Google+
DanKrell.com

Why your real estate agent’s experience is more important than you think:

Real Estate AgentsThe National Association of Realtors (realtor.org) publishes an annual profile of home buyers and sellers that includes data and descriptions about how consumers go about choosing a real estate agent.  There are obviously many factors that are involved in the choice, but it is striking that an agent’s experience is not a major reason for their hire; it seems as if most buyers and sellers hire an agent who was referred by someone the consumer knew, and that many buyers and sellers did not talk to more than one agent.

Even though experience is not heavily weighted in agent choice, it may be one intangible that should be considered when you choose your real estate agent.  A recent research study by Bennie Waller and Ali Jubran (“The Impact of Agent Experience on the Real Estate Transaction.” Journal of Housing Research 21, no. 1 (2012): 67-82) highlights the intuitive notion that an experienced agent can yield a better result than an inexperienced agent.

They concluded that hiring a “veteran” agent will have a positive effect on your home sale.  The data indicates that “rookie” agents, those who have had their real estate license two years or less, sell homes for less, take longer to sell homes, and are less efficient during the process.  Data collected from their sample indicated that rookie agents sold homes for about 10% less than experienced agents, which according to their sample data yielded an average net difference of $18,000 (the average list price was $201,297).  Homes listed by “veteran” agents sell about 32% faster than inexperienced agents.  And, experienced agents are more likely to expedite the transaction to completion.

One possible explanation provided by the researchers is that the experienced agents are more likely to list higher quality property that typically sells faster and for more money.  Although they concede that they cannot substantiate this rationalization by this study, they suggest that veteran agents are more successful in obtaining luxury real estate and new home listings.

Real Estate AgentA more likely reason for differences between rookie and veteran agents is the mindset brought forward to the business of real estate.  The investigators discuss how those who consider selling real estate their career are more successful and have better outcomes for their clients than those who do not.  They also suggest that those who consider themselves as “part-time” agents are less likely to achieve as high of a result in their transaction as the full time counterpart; they contend that successful veteran agents are dedicated and devoted to their career.

Other possible reasons for their conclusions (but not discussed in the study) are that veteran real estate agents are more acquainted with the nuances of the housing market and have an increased ability to engage the parties in the transaction.  Full time agents are invested in being aware of listing and sale activity in their respective markets, and network with other agents to compare notes.  Additionally, experienced agents may have developed the ability to easily connect with home buyers and sellers; as well as have greater capacity to understand the specific needs of buyers and sellers – thus facilitating a smoother and successful transaction.

The business of real estate is increasingly complex and difficult.  Rapidly changing demands on home buyers and sellers can be challenging and frustrating for those in the market.  Your agent’s experience, both general and specialized, could make the difference in your success.

More news and articles on “the Blog”
Protected by Copyscape Web Plagiarism Detector
This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. This article was originally published the week of April 8, 2013. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws. Copyright © 2013 Dan Krell.