Home Buyer Archives - Page 6 of 36 - Real Estate News and Commentary

May 24, 2019November 23, 2021

Buyer agent commission controversy

One of the hottest controversies in real estate that you have yet to hear about is who should pay buyer agent commissions. Agent commissions controversies have been around in one form or another for decades. The commissions issue typically becomes front and center when the housing market is doing well. This time, however, the buyer agent commission controversy is gaining steam and has the potential of changing (and possibly upending) residential real estate and online real estate platforms.

The debate is center in an anti-trust class action law suit filed against the National Association of Realtors and a number of major real estate brokerage brands. As I reported last month, the law suit alleges that the defendants engaged in “anticompetitive practices.” Among the alleged issues listed in the law suit, includes a “Buyer Broker Commission Rule” that requires buyer agent compensation for a home to be listed in the MLS.

Regardless of how a listing agreement “structures” broker commissions, the perception and general acknowledgement is that the (buyer broker) buyer agent commission is paid by the seller. The seller typically pays the listing broker a commission, which is shared if another broker represents the buyer. This commission “pass-through” is responsible for the growth of online platforms selling home buyer leads and contacts. It has also been responsible for the growth of real estate groups that act as “buyer mills,” which rely on high volume leads generated via online platforms and other means. It can be argued that because of Buyer Broker Commission Rules, the billions of dollars that are generated and spent on home buyer leads (as well as buyer rebates) can be traced back to the home seller.

Home sellers are not the only victims. A study (jstor.org/stable/24887258) conducted by Joachim Zietz and Bobby Newsome (A Note on Buyer’s Agent Commission and Sale Price; The Journal of Real Estate Research; 2001, Vol.21 No.3 p.245-254) revealed that buyer agent commissions had a positive effect on home sale price, but only on lower-priced homes. The conclusions suggested that buyer agents “do not act in the best interest of their clients because of the institutional structure of sales commissions.”

Is it possible that the MLS perpetuates steering and anticompetitive behavior? A recent study by Barwick, Pathak and Wong (Conflicts of Interest and Steering in Residential Brokerage; American Economic Journal; 2017, Vol.9 No.3 p.191-222) has shocking conclusions that resonates with those who are wary of the residential real estate industry. The study pointed out that real estate commissions are higher the US than other industrialized countries. The authors concluded, “Properties listed with lower commission rates experience less favorable transaction outcomes…they are 5% less likely to sell and take 12% longer to sell. These adverse outcomes reflect decreased willingness of buyers’ agents to intermediate low commission properties (steering)…” They “provide empirical support for regulatory concerns” because the data indicates buyer agents will steer their clients towards homes paying higher commission.

Home sellers can learn from home builders about marketing and agent compensation. Home builders figured out buyer broker commissions a long time ago. They will not pay advertised compensation to buyer brokers who don’t show up with their clients. And during hot markets, they pay a modest referral fee in lieu of commission.

All things considered, the issue of buyer broker commission is a complex issue that depends on multiple factors, including market conditions. However, increasing awareness is inventing new business models and lower buyer broker compensation expectations.

Original located at https://dankrell.com/blog/2019/05/24/buyer-agent-commission-controversy

By Dan Krell
Copyright © 2019

If you like this post, do not copy; instead please:
link to the article
like it on facebook
or re-tweet.

Protected by Copyscape Web Plagiarism Detector

Disclaimer. This article is not intended to provide nor should it be relied upon for legal and financial advice. Readers should not rely solely on the information contained herein, as it does not purport to be comprehensive or render specific advice. Readers should consult with an attorney regarding local real estate laws and customs as they vary by state and jurisdiction. Using this article without permission is a violation of copyright laws.

May 20, 2019June 3, 2020

Mixed housing stats

This week’s National Association of Realtors press release (nar.realtor) sends mixed signals about the housing market. Reports of sluggish home sales and slowing home price appreciation is not what you would expect when the spring market should be humming along. But then again, mixed housing stats may be a vital sign of a healthy market in motion.

First, let’s talk about home sale prices. The NAR’s report on metro home prices and affordability indicate that the average home sale price for the first quarter of the year was $254,800. This is a 3.9 percent increase compared to the same time last year. Average home sale prices in the Baltimore metro area were slightly higher than the rest of nation at $275,300. Not surprisingly, Washington metro prices were significantly higher at $420,000 (a 6.5 increase from the same time last year).

The latest S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index (spindices.com) is almost spot on with the NAR, indicating a 4 percent increase in home sale prices nationwide.

Affordability is always a concern when mixed housing stats confound the market. So, how much income do you need to qualify for a home? The National Association of Realtors Qualifying Income report indicates the average qualifying income for a 5 percent down conventional mortgage is $60,143 nationwide. The average qualifying income in the Baltimore metro area is slightly higher at $64,982. However, because of significantly higher home sale prices, the average qualifying income in the Washington metro area is $99,137.

The neighboring Baltimore and Washington metro areas highlight home pricing extremes in competing markets. Many home buyers who work in the Washington metro area are opting for longer commutes to make homeownership affordable. Others are opting for alternative work to not only lower their housing cost, but eliminate the commute as well. Commenting on affordability, NAR’s chief economist Lawrence Yun stated, “There are vast home price differences among metro markets. The condition of extremely high home prices may not be sustainable in light of many alternative metro markets that are much more affordable. Therefore, a shift in job search and residential relocations into more affordable regions of the country is likely in the future.”

Although home sale prices continue to climb, the national home sale picture is another story. The 1.2 percent increase in spring home sales compared to winter sales should be expected. However, the 5.4 percent decrease from last spring is a disappointment. According to MarketStats by ShowingTime (getsmartcharts.com), the number of homes sold in the Mid-Atlantic region decreased 4.77 percent year-to-date. There was a larger decline in Montgomery County, where there was a 7.25 percent decrease in home sales year-to-date!

Days-on-market is another fundamental indicator of the housing market. And, like home prices and units sold, days-on-market can vary depending on the local market. Homes in the Mid-Atlantic region are taking a bit longer to sell, as days-on-market increased 7.04 percent to 76 days. However, houses in Montgomery County are selling quicker, where days-on-market decreased about 13 percent to 65 days.

Mixed housing stats can confound home buyers, sellers, and their agents. But consider the analysis of David M. Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. He stated that that home sale prices gains have been slowing down until recently. And although mortgage rates are lower, home sales have “drifted down” from their peak during February 2018. Even new home sales and residential investment have shown weakness since last year.

Original published at https://dankrell.com/blog/2019/05/20/mixed-housing-stats/

By Dan Krell
Copyright © 2019

If you like this post, do not copy; instead please:
link to the article
like it on facebook
or re-tweet.

May 6, 2019May 6, 2019

Home buying process simplified

An article by Tracey Barbour for the Alaska Business Monthly (Younger buyers partial to homeownership, home-buyer education, online resources: akbizmag.com; September 2017) describes the growing phenomenon of millennial homeownership. Not surprisingly, many millennial home buyers are taking advantage of home buyer assistance programs. Because millennials grew up with the internet, you might think that they would rely less on professionals when home buying. But the opposite seems to be true. A majority of millennials prefer to connect with a single point-of-contact when applying for a mortgage (and likely when dealing with real estate agents). However, millennials do rely on the internet when it comes to understanding the home buying process. They spend copious amounts of time doing their own research on the home buying process.

It’s not just millennials, but most home buyers are taking advantage of online and digital resources to learn about the home buying process. Maybe it’s because we live in an era of information overload that home buyers are more aware of the many factors that need to be considered before buying a home. Regardless, the abundance of “home buying process” resources are helping home buyers decide if they are suited to buy a home, assisting with financial planning of buying a home, finding down payment assistance, mortgage application information, and so much more.

It used to be that if you were a first-time home buyer, you relied heavily on your real estate agent for the education of the home buying process. You placed a great deal of trust on their guidance. The home buying process was envisioned as a step-by-step formula to purchasing a house. The purpose of explaining the home buying as a process was to reduce the major aspects of home buying into distinct parts and make it seem simple and trouble-free.

The home buying process is a big ball of stuff…

Today, the standard “home buying process” as explained by real estate agents seems nebulous and lacking detail. Maybe even a little pedestrian. Maybe it’s because real estate agents tried to make their job easy and have control, but the word “process” incorrectly suggests that there is an exact order that is “one size fits all.” However, the home buying process is more aptly described by adapting the “timey-wimey” quote of the 2007 episode of Dr. Who (Blink) to say “People assume that home buying is a strict progression of cause to effect, but it is more like a big ball of home buying stuff.”

Moreover, all home buyers are different. Not just in their preferences, but also in their needs and expectations. And thus, home buyers will experience the process differently. One thing I can confirm from eighteen years of listing and selling homes is that all transactions are different.

But don’t discount the value of the traditional “home buying process” meme. Consider it a framework of mini-processes that are critical to buying a home. Each mini-process will be proceeding at its own pace parallel to other processes.

Choose your buyer agent well. The role of your buyer agent should go beyond helping you visit homes and writing an offer. Your agent should be there every step of the way to settlement helping you maneuver through the “big ball of home buying stuff.” When going through home buying process you can encounter pitfalls and setbacks that are time consuming and emotionally draining. Your agent should be able to offer guidance on coping and resolving any potential issues.

Original published at https://dankrell.com/blog/2019/05/06/home-buying-process-simplified/

By Dan Krell
Copyright © 2019

If you like this post, do not copy; instead please:
link to the article
like it on facebook
or re-tweet.

April 9, 2019May 2, 2019

After you move in

Moving into your new home is exciting. You just went through an intensive process that tested your character. You feel a sense of relief it’s over. But the work is not over, it’s just beginning. What you do after you move into your new home can help maintain its value. It also can save you time, money, and keep your home functioning.

Of course, there are the standard items that needs immediate attention after you move in. Changing the locks is the number one item on the new homeowner list for obvious reasons. Deep cleaning the home is a task that is also performed, especially if the previous owner had pets. Keep all warranty information, including a home warranty policy (if you have one), in a safe place so you can find it if you need it. Make sure you know where the water shut off valve and the main electrical breaker is located in case of an emergency. Change of address forms from the USPS need to be completed to ensure you receive your mail. A visit to the DMV is necessary to change the address on your driver’s license.

But what else can you do after you move in to make life easier in your new home? Revisit your home inspection report. If the home seller made repairs, make sure you keep those invoices (your agent should have asked for those receipts prior to closing). If there is a problem with any of the repairs, you can call the associated contractor to reinspect the repair. However, it’s likely that the seller didn’t repair everything in the inspection, or maybe they didn’t repair anything. Review the report to see which items require your immediate attention, or may require attention within the year. Make sure you install any missing safety items (such as smoke and carbon dioxide detectors). Taking care of the urgent items immediately will likely prevent expensive repairs down the road. Keep the list of items likely needing attention in the future, so you can check them when you conduct regular maintenance.

Next on the list , after you move in, is to create a maintenance schedule. For most new home owners, maintenance seems to be a dirty word. After all, you just moved in and the last thing you want to focus on is “upkeep.” But putting off repairs can make the likelihood of damage to your home and repair expense increase over time. Research has even verified that deferred maintenance lowers your home’s value. Your home inspection report also should have information about maintaining systems such as (but not limited to): HVAC, electric, plumbing, roof, and exterior.

If you haven’t yet created a maintenance budget, do it now. Some of the systems may need replacing sooner than others. Check your home inspection report for the systems’ age and average life expectancy. Start saving to replace systems (HVAC, roof, etc.) so it’s not as much of a financial burden when the time comes to replace them.

Life happens and so does the occasional surprise. It is not uncommon for maintenance and other “surprises” to occur your first year in the home. Although it may seem correct to blame the home inspector, they are not perfect. They are limited to what they can see. “Surprises” often occur in a system or area that was not observable during the time of the inspection. It is my experience that home inspectors make themselves available within the first year of ownership to answer questions relating to their report. Some will even reinspect the item in question.

Original published at https://dankrell.com/blog/2019/04/09/after-you-move-in/

By Dan Krell
Copyright © 2019.

If you like this post, do not copy; instead please:
link to the article
like it on facebook
or re-tweet.

April 2, 2019June 3, 2019

Negotiating agent commissions

It’s no secret that residential real estate agent commissions are decreasing. Market forces has created new broker models that has put downward pressure on commissions. Many agents embrace consumers negotiating agent commissions.

If market forces are working in negotiating agent commissions, and commissions are decreasing, you might wonder about a recent class-action law suite.

If successful, an anti-trust class-action law suit filed March 6^th could potentially change the landscape of the residential real estate industry. The law suit alleges that the National Association of Realtors and a number of major real estate brokerage brands engaged in “anticompetitive practices.”

According to the law firm Hagens Berman (hbsslaw.com), “the lawsuit alleges NAR and the Big Four have enacted a set of anticompetitive policies intended to prevent competition among real estate brokers, as well as stopping buyers and sellers form negotiating commissions, including: Only allowing listing brokers to list a property on an MLS if the listing broker makes a unilateral, non-negotiable offer of compensation on the MLS to buyer brokers. Prohibiting buyers and sellers from negotiating buyer broker commission. Prohibiting brokers from disclosing commissions offered on MLS. Allowing brokers to take both buyer and seller commissions, if the buyer is not represented by a broker. This anticompetitive activity has been devised at the national level and enforced at the local levels.”

I am not an attorney, but I have been listing and selling homes for over seventeen years. These thoughts are my own. I am not speaking for anyone except myself. I am offering insight from my professional experience.

On the face of it the lawsuit assertions are false. First, the allegations make it sound as if home sellers have no choice in how they sell their home except to use a full-service exclusive real estate broker. As I wrote just last month, home sellers have many options in selling a home. Besides selling “By Owner,” there are multiple broker options as well, including (but not limited to) MLS placement services, limited services and à la carte.

These assertions also make it sound as if a home seller can only get an “exclusive right to sell” listing agreement with a real estate broker. But again, the home seller has options in the type of listing agreement and broker agency type. Because my space is limited and the issue of brokerage representation is technical, I won’t expound on the types of listing agreements and home seller representation. However, each type of listing agreement has specific benefits and disadvantages.

Furthermore, commissions have always been negotiable. And market forces have been in favor of consumers negotiating agent commissions. The lawsuit’s assertions about real estate commissions are misconceived and cliché. The matter of real estate commissions can be complex and depends on a number of factors, which can include (but is not limited to) market conditions, type of representation, types of services provided, among other things. Additionally, home sellers are not the only party to a transaction that negotiates commission. Home buyers who are represented by a broker negotiate the buyer agent commission as well.

The internet has created an empowered savvy consumer. Like other industries, public access to information (internet) has been a major factor in reducing real estate broker fees and commissions. Both listing broker and buyer agent commissions have decreased. The internet has allowed home buyers to find home listings on their own regardless of advertised buyer agent compensation, including non-MLS listings such as home builder and FSBO listings.

Although the NAR has yet to issue a formal statement, NAR vice president Mantill Williams was quoted as saying on Fox Business’ Bulls and Bears program, “We think this lawsuit is baseless and it has no merit. The state and federal courts have considered challenges to the MLS and they’ve concluded the Multiple Listing Service actually benefits consumers.”

Original published at https://dankrell.com/blog/2019/04/02/negotiating-agent-commissions/

If you like this post, do not copy; instead please:
link to the article
like it on facebook
or re-tweet.